|
Minutes of the Maresfield Parish Council meeting held on Tuesday
17th July 2007
held in the Memorial Hall, Nutley
Present:
Cllr K Ogden (Chairman), Cllr D Barlow, Cllr A Clarke, Cllr D
Finch, Cllr H Fry,
Cllr R Galley, Cllr J Handley, Cllr P Harris, Cllr Mrs J Penfold,
Cllr C Stevenson,
Cllr Mrs V Taylor, DCllr Mrs S Martin, Mr T Allen (Clerk) and
Mrs C Goossens (Asst Clerk)
Public:
Mr M Wheeler, Mr F Taylor
A. Public Session.
Mr F Taylor made the following comments:
o
He wrote a long letter to the Clerk with a number of queries
relating to the recent co-option of Cllr Fry and has now
received a reply reassuring him that all procedures were carried
out correctly. Mr Taylor confirmed that he is now satisfied that
this was indeed the case.
Mr M Wheeler made the following comments:
o
He has been in correspondence with the Clerk and Councillors
strongly contesting the legality of the meeting at which Cllr
Fry was co-opted to fill one of the Maresfield ward vacancies.
o
He believes that the method used to fill the position was
undemocratic and unethical.
o
He considers it unbelievable that a Nutley candidate stood for
two available positions i.e. one for Fairwarp ward and the other
for Maresfield ward.
o
He is baffled as to why Cllr Mrs Taylor was not able to take
part in the vote to fill the Maresfield ward vacancies.
o
Why didn’t Cllr Finch declare an interest having had a long
standing working relationship with one of the candidates i.e. Mr
Fry.
o
He does not feel that the delay in receiving a response to his
correspondence from the Clerk was satisfactory.
o
Having sought advice, he is now satisfied that the proceedings
of the meeting were indeed legally correct.
o
He feels that the whole situation can be resolved if Cllr Fry
resigns and puts himself forward at a future election.
o
He asks the Parish Council for an apology to Maresfield
residents for letting them down by co-opting a Nutley resident
to fill the vacancy for a Maresfield Ward Councillor, despite
there being an upstanding and well respected Maresfield resident
also standing for the position.
Mrs V Taylor made the following comments speaking in her
capacity as a Parishioner:
o
She never considered the cooption to be illegal but she does
consider it unethical.
o
Prior to the co-option she carefully considered which of the
candidates she thought the Fairwarp residents would want to
represent them. Her belief was that it should be an individual
from that village who would actively participate in village life
and would represent the people of that village most
appropriately and this is how she would have voted.
o
What were Parish Councillors thinking when they voted for a
Nutley resident they certainly weren’t thinking about the best
interests of Maresfield residents and this way she feels let
down by the Councillors who voted for Cllr Fry.
o
She is aware that there was lobbying for the Nutley based
candidate at the end of May 2007, long before the Maresfield
based candidates came into the running.
o
When the first round of co-option took place there was no
majority. There was a tie between Mr Fry and Mrs Penfold. So
even at this stage there were Councillors voting for a Nutley
based candidate for the Maresfield ward vacancy.
o
Mrs Taylor feels that any concerns regarding husband and wife
relationship on the Council was a “red-herring” and stated that
her position was not “sour grapes”. She would have formed the
same opinion for any Maresfield based candidate. Indeed she had
actively encouraged Cllr Mrs Penfold to stand for co-option.
o
When a Nutley ward Councillor resigned earlier this year, Cllr
Fry was instrumental in ensuring that a by-election was held
because he felt this was the most democratic means of filling
the vacancy.
o
Mrs Taylor invited Cllr Fry to resign and stand for election in
Maresfield Ward
PCSO Karen Juniper joined the meeting.
The following points were also noted in discussion:
o
The Clerk confirmed that he had advised Cllr Mrs Taylor that as
her husband was standing for co-option this was a clear example
of a prejudicial interest and Cllr Mrs Taylor confirmed at the
time that she was happy with this advice and should withdraw
from the meeting.
o
Cllr Stevenson noted that there are no clear boundaries with
regard to when Councillors should declare an interest.
o
The Clerk reminded Councillors that it is their individual
responsibility to declare interests at the appropriate time and
that advice can always be sought from the Clerk and Assistant
Clerk.
o
The Chairman pointed out that the decision to hold a paper
ballot was entirely correct and within Council procedures.
Cllr Fry made the following comments:
o
Cllr Stevenson’s remarks with regard to when Councillors should
declare an interest indicate that he doesn’t fully understand
the matter.
o
The statements made by Mr Wheeler about him are untrue,
defamatory and libellous. Mr Wheeler further suggests that he
has acted improperly as a Parish Councillor. Despite having
asked Mr Wheeler for an apology he has not as yet received one.
o
The suggestion by Cllr Mrs Taylor that he was elected as part of
an “Old Boys Network” is improper and he asked her to withdraw
the accusation or stand accused of violating the Councillors
Code of Conduct.
Cllr Mrs Taylor refused to withdraw this statement and said that
on advice from the Clerk she would be happy to stand accused of
violating the Councillors Code of Conduct.
Mr Wheeler stated that he has not received any communication
from Cllr Fry other than a blank email to which he responded
asking Cllr Fry what he intended to say. Further to this he has
not received a subsequent response from Cllr Fry. The Clerk
stated that Mr Wheeler and Cllr Fry should sort out their
communications difficulties outside of the meeting.
Cllr Finch stated that he felt that the complainants were trying
to divide the Council and that declaring an interest is not
necessary in regard to passing acquaintances. Cllr Finch
believes that the Council had acted properly and legally in the
co-option of Cllr Fry and that the matter should therefore be
brought to a conclusion.
PCSO Juniper made the following comments:
o
Local police have received a number of reports of a suspicious
caller trying to read meters. Local PCSOs did speak to the
suspect and he turned out to be a genuine meter reader.
o
Not many bogus caller reports have been received this year but
everyone is encouraged to check for official ID when callers
come to the door.
o
There have been a number of reports of a moped being driven
around at the end of Clockhouse Lane in Nutley. The Police will
be visiting the offender and issuing a Section 59 regarding such
behaviour on the Forest.
o
PCSO transportation continues to remain a problem but it is
hoped that it hasn’t impacted too greatly on the role of PCSOs
within the community.
The public session was closed and the Chairman opened the
meeting.
1296. To approve apologies for absence and to note other
non-attendance.
Cllr J Gutteridge, Cllr W King, Cllr R Street, CCllr A Reid,
DCllr M Hoy and DCllr N Buck.
It was Agreed that item 1300 should be moved to this
point in the meeting.
1300. To consider complaints received regarding Councillor
co-options for Maresfield Ward conducted at the meeting of
Council held on 19th June 2007.
The following points were noted:
o
Parish Councillors are responsible for representing the
interests of all villages in the Parish.
o
Cllr Fry refused invitations for him to resign and put himself
up for future re-election, and asked Cllr Mrs Taylor if she
understood the rules for co-option. He stated that he will
continue to represent all wards in the Parish as he has done in
the past when he was on the Parish Council, although he will of
course take a greater interest in Maresfield matters so that he
can represent the village and talk about its issues
knowledgeably.
o
Cllr Fry stated that he had recently been instrumental in
requesting an election in Nutley rather than a co-option mainly
because he felt there had been too many co-options in the past
and that the Quality Status of the Parish Council was in danger.
o
The Chairman stated that having checked with WDC the recent
co-option has not jeopardised the Quality Status of the Parish
Council as it occurred on the back of the recent election.
o
The Clerk confirmed that declarations of interest do not solely
relate to possible monetary gains.
Cllr Finch proposed Council agrees that there is no case for it
to answer because it has acted legally. Cllr Fry seconded this
motion. 8 Councillors voted against this proposal and 2 in
favour. The Chairman abstained from the vote. The proposal was
defeated.
o
It has been known for individuals to be co-opted as Parish
Councillors to represent a ward in which they do not live.
CCllr Whetstone joined the meeting.
o
The Clerk stated that it appears to be generally agreed that
legally and procedurally the recent co-option of Cllr Fry was
acceptable and Council as a body has acted properly.
o
If there had been enough Maresfield candidates for the May
election this current situation would not have occurred.
o
Cllr Galley referred to the 2006 by-election for Nutley at which
he was elected and noted that he doesn’t live within the Parish
at all but within three miles of its boundaries which accords
with eligibility criteria.
Cllr Galley proposed that this Council values the contribution
of all the parties concerned, understands the worries expressed
by Maresfield residents, asserts that the process applied in the
co-option was legal and agrees that a democratic vote was held.
This was seconded by Cllr Fry. This proposal was Agreed
by majority.
PCSO Juniper, Mr Taylor and Mr Wheeler left the meeting.
1297. Minutes of the previous meeting held on 19th
June 2007 for adoption.
The minutes were Adopted.
Re. Item 1287.2.3 in the minutes of the previous meeting,
Councillors have yet to convene to discuss the possibility of a
name change for the Parish Council and the suitability of the
Parish Office.
All Councillors originally nominated to form the working party
confirmed their wish to be involved with the exception of Cllr
Stevenson due to work commitments. Cllr Mrs Penfold also agreed
to join the working party. ACTION: Clerk to arrange a
meeting date.
1298. Reports by and questions to:-
1.
County
Councillors.
CCllr Whetstone made the following remarks:-
- Governance of the Forest. A document will be produced to
define the outcomes of the recent meetings which have been held
on this subject. Consultation around the Parishes has been
concluded and was by and large successful. The Clerk to the
Conservators is currently drawing up a schedule of winter works
including maintenance and clearing of the heath land on the
Forest.
- DCllr Hoy is sorry not to be in attendance but he has
recently been in and out of hospital.
- ESCC’s fostering service has received a “highly recommended”
score in a recent report. There are very few children’s homes
and virtually all children have to go to foster homes.
- ESCC received a “satisfactory to good” report in the recent
Corporate Assessment by the Audit Commission. It was noted that
ESCC is of course always striving to improve.
2.
District Councillors.
DCllr Mrs S Martin gave a brief report on the LDF process, Core
Strategy Issues, suggested development potential for the
villages in and around the Ashdown Forest and details of public
consultation in relation to these.
DCllr Ogden – WDC has £14m of funds allocated for Affordable
Housing and yet no building has been started in the area to
date.
1299. Council bodies: Actions, minutes and reports by, and
questions to, Chairmen:-
1. Environment.
Cllr Barlow reported the following:
o
The situation at Parklands Play Area appears to be resolved. He
visited the site some days ago and spoke with a number of
mothers who seemed relatively pleased with the outcome.
o
Fords Green – he has put a report into the Clerk regarding
action necessary on items which in his opinion are defective.
The Council needs to look at how it maintains its play areas and
the possibility of a contractor fulfilling this requirement.
The Clerk voiced his support for Cllr Barlow and reported that
unfortunately the last meeting of Environment Committee when a
number of these issues were due to be discussed, was not quorate.
At the next meeting scheduled for 31st July 2007,
these matters will be on the agenda for discussion.
The Clerk confirmed that the formal Annual Play Area Inspection
has now been carried out and that the formal written report is
expected imminently and will go before the next Environment
Committee meeting.
The Chairman reminded Councillors that if unable to attend a
meeting it is imperative that the Clerk is alerted to their
absence so that every effort can be made to ensure that the
meeting is quorate.
2. Finance & Administration:-
1. Month 3 Financial reports.
The Clerk reported that the F&A Committee reviewed these reports
at its last meeting and no major issues were raised by Cllr
Street.
2. Councillors audits of Parish
Council Accounts 2007/08.
The Clerk referred Councillors to the schedule as circulated
with the meeting papers.
3. Approval of Assistant Clerk’s
annual salary point increase.
The Clerk stated that following the Assistant Clerk’s excellent
annual appraisal an increment in salary amounting to an extra
£16 per month is now due with effect from 1st April
2007. This was Agreed.
Cllr Stevenson commended the Asst Clerk for her minute taking.
4. Approval of an upgrade to the
parish office computer network.
The Clerk referred Councillors to Cllr Stevenson’s proposal as
circulated with the meeting papers. The proposal is a
remarkably cheap solution to the upgrade and some elements of
the old machine will be used in the new one. Councillors
Agreed the following:-
-
To
approve this upgrade to the Parish Office computer network
i.e. the purchase of a new PC base unit as specified in Cllr
Stevenson’s attached briefing report.
-
To
authorise Cllr Stevenson to make this purchase from DABS.com
using his own credit card on behalf of the Parish Council,
as this special offer is only available “on-line”.
-
To
authorise the virement of the £100.00 Website Development
budget (code 4411) for this purpose, to supplement the
amount of £151.00 remaining in the PC Upgrades budget (code
4308).
3. Planning.
Cllr Stevenson reported the following:-
o
The Planning Committee will be responding with further comments
to the Planning Inspector regarding O2’s appeal against WDC’s
refusal to allow planning permission to site a fake fir
telephone mast at Tyelands farm in Nutley. It is hoped that the
Planning Inspector on visiting the site, will understand the
rationale of the Parish Council in its objection.
o
Cllrs Barlow, Clarke and Ogden are currently reviewing the
planning white paper entitled “Planning for a Sustainable
Future”. The consultation period ends on 17th August
2007 and Cllr Stevenson urged the nominated Councillors to
revert to him with their comments prior to the next Planning
Committee meeting.
The Clerk noted the tremendous amount of work that Cllr
Stevenson does in his role as Chairman of the Planning Committee
and particularly commended him for his efforts regarding the O2
appeal, in putting together illustrative 3D maps to accompany
the Parish Council’s submission to the Planning Inspector. Cllr
Mrs Taylor supported the Clerks comments.
4. Strategy:-
Cllr Galley reported the following:-
o
A line has now been drawn the under issue of a branch surgery of
the AFHC in the Parish. The Committee has agreed and recommends
that a branch surgery should feature as an element of the Parish
Council’s LDF input to WDC.
o
There remains uncertainty with regard to the future of Nutley
post office. An Area Plan is being produced by the Government
together the Post Office Ltd, which will determine the future of
Post Offices. ACTION: Clerk to acquire a copy of relevant
report expected to be available in Sept 2007.
Cllr Stevenson suggested that those non-Councillor committee
members who have recently resigned from the Strategy Committee
should be sent a letter thanking them for their contribution.
ACTION: Clerk.
1. Local Development Framework –
WDC Issues & Options consultation.
Cllr Galley reported “surgeries” have been fixed for three days
of the week commencing 23rd July 2007, which will
primarily be listening sessions where Parishioners are invited
to give their views. It was noted that there is a need for
volunteers to help man these sessions. Councillors should have
a broad understanding of what is in the LDF document although a
full copy will be available for reference.
Councillors were referred to the relevant documents as
circulated with the meeting papers. ACTION: All
Councillors to revert to Clerk with availability.
2. People’s Local Utility Group
(PLUG) – update by Cllr Finch.
Cllr Finch asked that this item be deferred to the next Council
meeting.
1300. To consider complaints received regarding Councillor
co-options for Maresfield Ward conducted at the meeting of
Council held on 19th June 2007.
See above.
1301. Adoption of proposed changes to Committee remits.
These were Agreed.
1302. Outside bodies’ reports.
The Chairman reported that Maresfield Conservation Group now has
a lady Chairman for the first time in 18 years and that this
group is moving forward in conjunction with the Parish Council
on LDF work.
Cllr Fry reported that older peoples groups in East Sussex have
joined together to form the East Sussex Seniors Association.
This group has particular interest in the LDF with regard to
ensuring that the interests of older people are well
represented.
1303. Chairman’s Report followed by questions to Chairman.
The Chairman thanked Committee Chairmen for their hard work.
He together with the Clerk met with four Officers from WDC’s
Housing and Planning Department and visited potential Affordable
Housing sites in the Parish. The Chairman and Clerk were quite
pleased with the outcome of this meeting and a full report will
be made in due course.
Cllr Mrs Taylor enquired as to any progress regarding Cllr Kings
suggestion that WDCs decision re. Persimmon’s outline
application at Park Farm is referred to the Scrutiny Committee.
The Chairman explained to Councillors that Cllr King’s query
i.e. whether the matter should be referred to the Scrutiny
Committee was based on whether firstly, DCN had an opportunity
to and indeed did review the traffic assessment and secondly
whether an assessment had been carried out to consider the
impact on the Ashdown Forest of the increased number of people
living in the new houses and using the Forest for recreational
purposes. The Chairman confirmed that the traffic assessment
was in fact forthcoming a couple of days prior to the meeting.
Furthermore, should the Parish Council wish to take this issue
before the scrutiny committee it must make the appropriate
representations prior to the Scrutiny Committee’s next meeting
on 28th August 2007.
DCllr Mrs Martin noted that at recent a meeting with the Clerk
to the Forest, Dr Prendergast confirmed that it is stipulated
that no development should take place within 5km of the Ashdown
Forest. It was noted that Dr Prendergast is very familiar with
this issue and that it might be worthwhile contacting him in
this regard with a view to obtaining more information. Such
rules may cover both the Grampian and Maresfield sites.
1304. Clerk’s Report followed by questions to Clerk.
The Clerk made the following verbal report:-
o
There is a lot more value in face to face meetings and getting
out and about that to being office bound, as was clearly
demonstrated when he and the Chairman recently met with WDC
officers regarding Affordable Housing.
o
He has spent a great deal of time finalising the external audit
annual return which now awaits the Chairman’s signature.
CCllr Whetstone left the meeting.
The Clerk confirmed that he sent to Cllr Finch by email the
information he requested at the last meeting regarding
insurance.
1305. Payments to be made: for approval.
The Clerk noted that also circulated with the meeting papers was
a schedule of grants and donations which have already been
approved by Council and will be paid and distributed this month.
Furthermore, everyone applying for a grant next year must fill
in a comprehensive application form which all groups and
societies have been sent together with a copy of the Parish
Council’s grants policy.
Payments totalling £7,744.05 were Approved.
1306. Communications:-
1. ‘The Parish Matters’ – articles for
Summer edition.
Councillors were referred to the schedule as circulated with the
meeting papers.
The Clerk stated that the Parish Office is currently looking at
alternative formats and means of circulation for the document.
1307. Date of next meetings:-
1. 7th August 2007 (Maresfield) –
extraordinary meeting to agree Council’s response to
WDC Issues & Options consultation for the Local Development
Framework.
This meeting will be the outcome of the deliberations of the LDF
working party which will be put before Council for approval.
DCllr Mrs S Martin, Cllr Clarke and Cllr Barlow offered their
apologies for this meeting.
2. 18th September 2007 (Fairwarp)
- next full Council.
There being no further business the meeting closed at 21.22.
|