|
Minutes
of the Meeting of Maresfield Parish Council held on
Tuesday
20 July 2004 in Nutley Memorial Hall
Present:
Cllr W King, Cllr P Tester, Cllr G Hardy, Cllr J Gutteridge,
Cllr K Ogden,
Cllr R
Street, Cllr R Tester, Cllr H Fry, Cllr C Stephens, Cllr Ms M
Thomas,
Cllr S
Leaney, Cllr R Woodgate, Cllr T Sparrow. DCllr N Buck, DCllr Mrs
P Kennedy. Clerk: Tony Allen.
1.
Apologies
for absence
– Cllr Mrs S Weekes (urgent personal business), DCllr J Hollins,
DCllr Mrs S Martin.
2. Declarations of interest
– None.
3. Minutes:-
3.1 Minutes of last meeting for approval
– “ACTION: Clerk” to be deleted from the first paragraph of Item
3.2. In Item 8, reference to Rotherfield District Council to be
altered to Rotherfield Community Tourism Initiative. The minutes
were Approved, as amended.
3.2 Matters arising from those minutes
– Cllr Fry informed the meeting that a clear description of the
WDC Regulatory Committee is on the WDC web site.
4. Reports by and questions to:-
4.1 County councillor
– No report.
4.2 District councillors
– DCllr Buck stated that there was no further information
regarding the Ashdown Business Park since the WDC Cabinet
discussed the matter on 12 July 2004, from which the Parish
Council had been updated. DCllr Buck stated that WDC admitted
that the situation is a disgrace and would now maximise this
asset by reviewing the S.106 Covenants and seeking more money
from Summerthorne and canvassing for other purchasers for the
WDC portion of the site.
Cllr Leaney
joined the meeting.
DCllr Brown
stated that car parking charges were under review. DCllr Buck
stated that there would be full consultation with Parish
Councils, and maybe even individual households as well, over the
options (e.g. car parking charges vs. increases in Council Tax),
and in recognition of the effects on Parishioners of introducing
charges.
DCllr Brown
stated that he had attended the last WDC DCN meeting, now in the
new 12 Member format, but that the meeting was still very
lengthy.
Several
Councillors were concerned as to why the sale of the WDC portion
of the Ashdown Business Park had historically only been
discussed with Summerthorne, if the intention was to get the
best price. DCllr Buck stated that WDC believed the amounts
discussed with Summerthorne did represent the best price, in
view of the S.106 Covenants proposed. Concern was expressed at
the apparent absence of professional advice to WDC and at the
way in which the officer negotiating the deal was producing
delayed and non-commercial correspondence.
Cllr Ms M
Thomas asked whether it was true that WDC had to deal with a
financial deficit of £1.8m and that tourism funding was being
cut. Cllr Ms M Thomas stated that she had been informed by the
Ashdown Forest Tourism Association that the Information Centre
at the Llama Farm was to be closed. DCllr Buck stated that all
WDC expenditure was under review in order to keep Council Tax
increases below 3.5% with the amount needed to be found in the
region of £1.2m. DCllr Buck explained that the Tourist
Information Centres were under utilised and were no longer
affordable. Cllr King mentioned that the portfolio holder had
told the WDC Cabinet that there are plans to deliver the work
intended to be performed by the TICs by different means.
5.
Council bodies minutes and reports; Reports by and questions to
Chairmen:-
5.1 Business Park Development
Sub-Committee
– It was agreed to move this Item to the end of the Agenda,
as it was proposed to be discussed in Closed Session.
Council
Meeting minutes 20 July 2004
Page 2
5.2 Civil Protection
– The Chairman stated that Cllr Street hoped that another Cllr
would take over Chairmanship of the Civil protection Committee,
now that he had been elected Chairman of the Finance &
Administration Committee. ACTION: All Cllrs to consider
and advise the Chairman.
5.3 Communications Team
– It was agreed that the costs for the distribution of Parish
Matters would be discussed at the next Finance & Administration
Committee meeting, to ensure it reaches all households in the
Parish, and to ascertain whether the Nutley and Maresfield PCC
grants include an element for this.
5.4 Environment & Maintenance
– Cllr R Tester reported that the sign posts were awaiting
lettering, following which they will be installed by the ESCC
Village Team, supervised by Bruce Morley.
5.5 Finance & Administration
– The Clerk stated that he is liaising with the Treasurer of the
Social Club regarding the increase in rent agreed for the Parish
Office. Cllr Street stated that the Cllr audits were proceeding
well.
It was
agreed
that a ‘crib sheet’ was needed to help interpret the reports
from the accounting system. ACTION: Chairman.
5.6 Parklands Play Area Sub-Committee
– The Clerk informed the meeting that the opening ceremony would
be on 21 August 2004, between 4 pm and
8 pm.
5.7 Planning
– Cllr Ogden thanked DCllr Mrs P Kennedy for speaking at the
Local Plan Review Committee meeting on 19 July 2004 concerning
the plan for Maresfield. Cllr Ogden noted that the Parish
Council’s proposal had not been adopted but that further
representation could be made in the Autumn.
Cllr Ogden
stated that WDC were proceeding with the Affordable Housing
development for Old Forge Lane, despite ESCC reservations, with
a Parish consultation to be held in late August/early September,
prior to which all households in the Parish will be written to
for their views. Cllr Fry expressed concern that Parishioners
views should be a major factor and DCllr Buck stated that this
should indeed be the case. Cllr Leaney expressed concern that
WDC were not fully exploiting all Affordable Housing options.
DCllr Buck stated that the WDC team were doing a good job and
had identified 240 potential sites already.
The Clerk
stated that the complaint regarding A M Skips operating outside
its planning conditions had been referred to ESCC as WDC
consider it to be a waste issue, not a planning one. It was
agreed to review this case at the next Planning Committee
meeting. ACTION: Clerk.
DCllrs Buck
and Mrs P Kennedy left the meeting.
5.8 Policy Committee
– The Clerk circulated draft minutes of the meeting held on 7
July 2004. Cllr Ms M Thomas confirmed that the issue of
compensation for loss of earnings would go to the Finance &
Administration Committee once firm proposals and costings had
been developed.
The Clerk
circulated the proposed response to WDC’s Tourism Strategy
paper. Cllr Ms M Thomas outlined the thinking of the Policy
Committee behind the response and it was agreed that the
document was a good record of the Parish Council’s broad policy,
which would need more detailed discussion at a later date. The
response was Approved, subject to a check on whether or
not the Conservators issue short-term riding permits.
ACTION: Clerk.
The Chairman
stated that the Policy Committee Remit was that it should only
work on issues referred to it by Council, and that Item 4 of the
minutes regarding LDF was being handled by the Planning
Committee. ACTION: Chairman to discuss with Cllr Ms M
Thomas at a later date.
5.9 Strategy Sub-Committee
– Cllr Sparrow stated that, in recognition of the danger of over
consulting Parishioners, specific topics would be offered for
comment in Parish Matters and the Parish Magazines. It was
agreed that Andrew Wallace should be invited to join the
Sub-Committee. ACTION: Chairman to talk to Mr Wallace and
also to Kerry Jenkins who had also expressed interest.
Council
Meeting minutes 20 July 2004
Page 3
5.10 Traffic & Transport Committee
– Cllr Leaney stated that the 3 Village Working Groups had met
and submitted reports showing a good consensus on traffic issues
and possible solutions. Cllr Leaney stated that he had visited
Ditchling and Brasted to look at their traffic calming measures.
Cllr Leaney confirmed that a consultation document for
Parishioners would be put to Council at its September 2004
meeting and that input for 2005/06 budget/precept requirements
in the Autumn was on track.
The Chairman
reminded the meeting that the Committee’s Remit allowed it to
authorise expenditure of up to £500 per item, with an overall
limit of £2k. It was noted that in the current budget there was
no specific heading for the Committee, but that it could bid for
money allocated to the Village Plan.
6. Outside bodies’ reports:-
6.1 Ford's Green Committee
– Cllr P Tester stated that the last meeting was the AGM, the
minutes to be copied to the Clerk.
6.2 Maresfield Conservation Group
– Cllr Gutteridge stated that the last meeting was the AGM,
combined with a talk by John Dolwin, founder of Green Tourism in
Rotherfield. The Clerk circulated a report by Cllr Gutteridge on
this talk.
6.3 Maresfield Recreation Ground
Committee
– Cllr R Tester stated that there had been no meeting.
Cllr Sparrow
reported on Items 6.4 to 6.8.
6.4 Wealden District Association of Local
Councils
- The recent meeting included a discussion on the Local
Development Framework with Jeff Thomas of Wealden and the new
organisation to help local community website development – The
Local Channel. There was also confirmation of support for the
attempt to reinstate a form of Police Forum and complaints that
Wealden Planning Department was allowing poorer standards of
plan preparation and not following through enforcement orders.
6.5 Action in rural Sussex
- With the removal of village plan grants from the Countryside
Agency, AirS is working to assist those villages that applied
too late so as to ensure that the plans can still be prepared.
As we know the follow-on process after a plan is developed is
even harder to achieve and AirS is working with the Wealden LSP
to develop assistance for villages within Wealden.
6.6 Wealden Local Strategic Partnership
- While the LSP has worked hard to create its five year strategy
for Wealden, implementation seems to be going far too slowly.
Hopefully the pace will pick up in the Autumn. LSP’s in the
Sussex area do not get external funding, but some extra money
will come from collecting rates on behalf of ESCC.
6.7 Sussex Association of Local Councils
- Highlights of the recent executive meeting include continued
concern about the state of the infrastructure across East
Sussex, especially roads and railways; the lack of a strategy
for dealing with travellers (West Sussex and Lewes appear to
have adopted one); the need to monitor economic development so
as to ensure it both aids rural populations but does not destroy
the very nature of the rural environment. SALC now has a
website.
6.8 Community Rail Partnership
- The Uckfield Line Group work should now take off with the
appointment of a line officer based at Eridge. Cllr Buck is
chairman of that Group. Cllr King mentioned a report of a
decision by Network Rail as to spending priorities which calls
into question any upgrade of services on this line. The funding
is also almost in place for the Marshlink line.
7. Chairman's Report
– The Chairman stated that the use of the marquee had been
successful, but that the practicalities of cleaning, storage
etc. needed to be sorted out. It was agreed that the
issues of managing the hiring of the marquee and/or other
options would be discussed at the next meeting of the Finance &
Administration Committee. It was agreed that the marquee
should be made available for the Nutley Village Party on 24 July
2004.
Council
Meeting minutes 20 July 2004
Page 4
It was
agreed
that the Chairman, Cllr Fry and Cllr Woodgate should liaise
regarding the options they were investigating for the
development of the Parish Council web site.
8. Clerk's Report
– The Clerk was congratulated on his progress with the WWYC
course.
The Clerk
circulated a new spreadsheet to contain all significant
documents referred to the Parish Council for information or
comment, noting that some needed a response. It was agreed
that the review of RPG9 would be discussed at the next
Planning Committee meeting; the WDC Code of Practice for Town &
Parish Councils be referred to the Policy Committee; the Sussex
Ambulance Community First Responders document to be reviewed by
Cllr Street and the WDC Draft Statement of Licensing Policy was
for information only. ACTION: Clerk.
Cllr Sparrow
informed the meeting that he and the Chairman were devising a
programme for the Clerk during August to allow a holiday, more
time for training, getting out and about and attending some new
meetings.
The Clerk
informed the meeting that correspondence received, for
discussion at the next Traffic & Transport Committee meeting,
indicated that a Speed Indicator Device would be installed on
the Straight Half Mile.
9. Payments to be made: for approval
– These were Approved.
10.
Quality Council Report
– The Clerk circulated a report prepared by Cllr Fry. Cllr Fry
elaborated on the items in the report, noting that there was a
need to check whether the ethical framework had been formally
adopted by the Council. It was noted that the interpretation of
some of the qualification criteria was partly subjective. It
was agreed that a further update should be provided at the
next Council meeting in September 2004, to include a detailed
timetable of events/tasks leading up to an informal submission
for Quality Council status. ACTION: Cllr Fry & Clerk.
11.
Police Issues
– The response prepared by Cllr King and Cllr Fry, to the Sussex
Police consultation regarding contacts with the Chairmen and
Clerks of Parish Councils, was Approved. A letter to
Sussex Police, prepared by Cllr King and Cllr Fry, regarding
Police cover and policy, was Approved. ACTION:
Clerk to send these.
It was
agreed
that more discussion was needed on these subjects at a later
date.
12.
Any Other Business
– Cllr Ogden reported that 11 travellers caravans, led by a
scout vehicle, had been seen circulating Maresfield.
ACTION: All to spread the word and Clerk to inform Beryl Easton
and Barbara Isitt.
It was
decided that the meeting should remain in Open Session.
5.1 Business Park Development
Sub-Committee
– Cllr P Tester informed the meeting that the proposed letter to
WDC concerning the Business Park, drafted by the Chairman, was
based on discussions at the last meeting of this Sub-Committee
with Mr Peter Ross, a highly experienced local commercial
property agent.
It was
agreed,
by majority, that the recommendation for an element of housing
on the Business Park should be left in the letter to WDC.
Concerns were expressed that such housing would split Maresfield
Village across the by-pass, as there was still potential
development land within the by-pass; that children would have to
cross major roads; and that such a proposal had not been put to
Parishioners. However, it was noted that the site is on the WDC
Local Plan and that any firm plans would be subject to full
consultation; that there were already travellers on the site;
that the site would help to meet housing targets; and that a
proposal for housing may prevent the building of the waste
management site.
After
further discussion, it was agreed that the letter should be sent
to Charles Lant, CE WDC, and copied to the Ward DCllrs and the
press.
13.
Date of next meeting – 21 September 2004
There
being no further business, the meeting closed at 23:00
|