| Minutes Jan 06
|
|
At this level beneath this item |
Minutes of the meeting of Maresfield Parish Council held on Tuesday 17th January 2006, in the Village Hall, Maresfield
Present:
Cllr W King (Chairman), Cllr H Fry, Cllr J Gutteridge, Cllr G
Hardy, Cllr K Ogden,
Ms Kathy Watson (Sussex Express) and Mrs Cynthia Flittner.
1027 Public Session – None.
1028 Apologies for absence –
DCllr Mrs S Martin, DCllr Buck, DCllr Mrs P Kennedy, DCllr
Hollins[W
L K1]
1029 Declarations of interest – None. 1030 Minutes:- 1. Minutes of the Council meeting (20 December 2005) for adoption – Adopted. 2. Matters arising from these minutes – None.
1031 Reports by and questions to:- 1. County Councillors CCllr A Reid reported the following: · At a Cabinet meeting at the end of this month he will present his budget recommendation for 2006/07 and this will then go to Full Council on 21st Feb. £18 million worth of costs have been added to the budget. The Governments grant for East Sussex totals £1.4 million, there is subsequently a shortfall of £16.6 million, which will be funded in part via increased efficiencies, a reduction of services and an expected increase in council tax of between 4% and 5%. Mrs Cynthia Flittner joins the meeting. · Grant settlements for the next two years have been fixed. Of the 35 County Councils across England, 50% are now supported by the guaranteed minimum increase in their contribution. All County Councils receive a 2% increase in the grant from Central Government. However, RPI is 5.5[W L K2] % and therefore the Government is not making increases in line with current rates of inflation. Funding which in the past was used to help with borrowing is now directly at the cost of the local ratepayer, which is having a profound effect, for example with reference to the ability to rebuild Tideway School and the building of a link road around Hastings/Bexhill. · Adult Social Care and waste management continue to be the sectors with the most rapidly rising costs. East Sussex has the highest proportion of over 85’s in Southern England and the bid to move away from putting rubbish in the ground towards methods of processing it result in increased expenditure. · The organisation contracted to look at the business case review for the reinstatement of Lewes to Uckfield line have just submitted their scoping report and its contents are thought to be encouraging. The findings should be in the public domain in the next few weeks. · Maresfield and Buxted Parish Councils are to be congratulated on their notes from the meeting they held with Police Authority Representatives, with particular thanks to William King and Alison Crowe for what appears to have been a hugely helpful and positive meeting. Secondly, it would seem that the message of rural parishes is beginning to have some impact with regard to the Forward Policing Plan, and is being noticed amongst those who could have an effect on its outcome.
·
DCllr Brown enquired whether with reference to the Nutley
pavement widening and the flooding on the pavement outside of
Post Office, the necessary work has been done to prevent this
from happening again. The Clerk to raise this with ESCC.
Council Minutes 17 January 2006 Page 2
·
Cllr Fry enquired of CCllr Reid why, with a budget requirement
of £18 million, and with ESCC delivering the same services the
increase is so much greater than rate of inflation. · CCllr Reid stated that the EU Waste Management directive does not apply to East Sussex because our plan is already in motion. West Sussex is approximately 3 years behind East Sussex in terms of waste management planning. Furthermore, with particular reference to the Onyx application, to date it has been less than complete, which has resulted in the committee being unable to make a balanced decision either one way or the other. · Cllr Fry stated that with reference to CCllr Reid’s comments about the Police Authority, he was very glad to note Peter Jones (Chairman of Police Authority) has looked upon the efforts of both Maresfield and Buxted Parish Councils favourably. As far as progressing policing plan this year is concerned, Cllr Fry feels that Peter Jones is the only member of the Police Authority who has thus far been involved and that other members of the Police Authority ought to be up to speed and have a say as to what goes into the plan.
·
Cllr R Tester stated that he had heard many comments/complaints
regarding the cutting back of trees and vegetation at the Batts
Bridge roundabout and that the work carried out is likened to
vandalism. Similar work has been carried out all the way to
Forest Row. Furthermore, because the work hasn’t been done
properly, there are loose bits which will eventually fall off
onto the road. County Council was responsible for planting
trees far too close to the carriageway and Cllr R Tester hopes
that in the longer term such planting will not be repeated. ACTION: Clerk to write to ESCC Highways on this matter.
It was Agreed to send a letter to Cllr Matthew Lock to congratulate him on the efficient and speedy manner with which the Nutley Pavement widening project was carried out. ACTION: Chairman
2. District Councillors DCllr Brown reported the following: · Wealden District Council has seen staffing changes over the last few months which may result in lower numbers of personnel. · There has still been no definite decision with regard to moving part of WDC’s operation from Pine Grove to Hailsham. · The Planning department is currently looking at its processes and in particular delegated powers.
Cllr King noted with reference to the staffing changes raised by DCllr Brown, that at the Parishes Conference in late November 2005, this was reported by the Chief Finance Officer and there is some concern amongst the parishes that Wealden is now understaffed. Cllr King further reported that he has written to Nigel Coltman, who recognises the issue and is trying to arrange a meeting to discuss the matter with him.
Council Minutes 17 January 2006 Page 3
1032 Council bodies: Actions, minutes and reports by, and questions to, Chairmen:-
1.
Environment & Maintenance · The Parklands Play Area equipment issue cropped up again at the last meeting and there were some suggestions for tackling the matter as recorded in the draft minutes. · The Batts Bridge Road bus shelter remains an ongoing issue and the Parish Council is still negotiating with the insurance company to see if it can get sufficient funding to use a more durable / vandal proof material for the repair work.
i.
Access to Maresfield Recreation Ground – latest position
ii.
Fencing / Extended grazing of the Forest –Cllr
Hardy gave a brief explanation as to the history of this item.
It was noted that although the Clerk of the Conservators is
becoming increasingly aware of the general need for greater
consultation with those Parishes bordering the Forest,
Maresfield Parish Council would like to be consulted by the
Board of the Conservators with reference to all future plans for
the Ashdown Forest. The Clerk reported that in the papers circulated prior to the meeting, there is a copy of a letter sent to Dr Prendergast from Environment & Maintenance Committee and a note from Cllr Hardy regarding the latest position on the Parklands Play Area. 2. Finance & Administration i. Month 9 Financial Reports Cllr Street reported that there has been no meeting of the committee since last Full Council. There is nothing in the month 9 accounts about which Councillors should be anxious. A number of anomalies in the figures have been spoken about before. The budget is on target to end the year as reported at the last meeting when it was agreed together with the precept. 3. Planning Cllr Ogden referred Councillors to minutes of the Planning Committee meeting of 3rdJanuary. It was noted that planning has moved into a new era of operation, with Wealden District Council inviting Parish Councils to attend when WDC carry out their site visits. This is a big step forward.
i. Proposal to ‘call-in’ the
WDC
decision to include the housing allocation at Park Farm,
Maresfield, in the Revised Draft Local Plan Advantages/Disadvantages/Comments:- · A degree of cooperation may be lost between Wealden District Council and the Parish Council. · An advantage of plans as they stand is that in the fairly near future, there is going to be an increase in housing for those in the villages who need it. Adoption of Cllr King’s proposed revised strategy means that the building of these houses will be delayed.
Council Minutes 17 January 2006 Page 4 · If the Parish Council believes that if this is the right way forward for our community then one would assume that WDC will consider our request on this basis. · [W L K4] It was noted that 34 houses on the Park Farm development would be for the benefit of those on Wealden’s list not just Maresfield Parish people. · It would be advantageous to ensure that the correct infrastructure/access etc. is put in place and that a well thought out plan for the area is put together. · It must be emphasised that Maresfield Parish Council does not object to an allocation of housing for Maresfield. The reference to the 25% allocation in the village does not tally with what was said in the County Structure Plan - this is a point about WDC's Local Plan not conforming with requirements, not a NIMBY or sour grapes point. · CCllr Reid stated that the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) is very keen to see housing growth numbers accelerated in the South East both in delivery time and the numbers available. However, it is very important that the density, design and infrastructure to go with houses is carefully considered and implemented. Furthermore, in his opinion, Maresfield Parish Council can make a very strong case in this regard, especially in light of its previous work on the Village Plan. Maresfield Parish Council could make some very strong and progressive points. · By “calling in” this decision, the Parish Council is doing the right thing by the people of Maresfield who were against this plan and the way it was created.
It was
Agreed
unanimously[W
L K5]
to ‘call-in’ Wealden District Council’s decision to include the
housing allocation at Park Farm, Maresfield, in the Revised
Local[W
L K6]
Plan.
4. Policy Committee ACTION: Clerk to alert DCllr Brown to the date of the next Policy meeting.
5. Strategy Sub-Committee – Cllr Sparrow reported that the draft minutes of the last Strategy Sub-Committee meeting were circulated with the meeting papers and that the current key projects are as follows: · Youth – Pilot studies have been carried out but as yet the sub-committee has been unable to move forward to something more permanent, however, work is currently progressing on a Nutley one off event and on the provision of an ongoing youth facility in the village. · Health – Work is progressing with a view to getting the Primary Care Trust to look at the possibility of creating a sub-surgery in Nutley. A meeting has been arranged with Mr Bob Deschene at Sussex Downs & Weald PCT for the end of this month, with a view to discussing the matter further. · Elderly and Carers – The Sub-Committee is constantly making sure that these groups have everything they need, especially as they are not known to come forward and ask for assistance. Cllr Fry as Chairman of the Wealden Senior Citizens Partnership provides a useful contact with the elderly and those charged with furthering their interests. Council Minutes 17 January 2006 Page 5
· Website – Management of this is due to be taken in house by the end of January. All Parish Councillors were encouraged to look at the website and revert to the Parish Office with any useful comments or additional information. · Wealden Easylink Bus – The County and District Councillors were urged to alert Parish Council’s around Maresfield, Buxted and the villages around Crowborough, to the fact that we would like representation from them in discussions regarding the creation of a Crowborough based community transport network. These parishes have already been invited to send a representative to the next Easylink meeting to be held on 31st January. CCllr Reid encouraged the Parish to communicate its interest in a Community Bus directly with Cllr Matthew Lock at ESCC. ACTION: Clerk to invite Matthew Lock to the next Easylink Meeting.
6. Traffic & Transport Committee
Cllr King confirmed that he has chased Chief Inspector Blaker
with reference to the “new“ Speedwatch i.e. incorporating the
possibility of enforcement. As yet he has received no response
and therefore needs chasing once again.
ACTION: Clerk.
1033 Outside bodies’ reports
The Parishes of Wealden will be strongly represented on the project board overseeing the preparation of the District Statement of Community Involvement, a key stage in the preparation of the Local Development Framework. Local representatives will include one from this Parish and probably one from Buxted. At its meeting tomorrow (Wednesday) WDALC is likely to hear a report from the new Police Commander for Wealden that the number of Police Community Support Officers will increase this year in Sussex. There will also be moves to base them in their communities(!) and the police will be looking for suitable shared office accommodation from which each PCSO can operate, rather than having to book on and off at a police station. Action in rural Sussex/SALC These two organisations have been closely involved in the development of the County Local Area Agreement (LAA). The actual agreement still has to be finalised but the inclusion of Village Appraisals (Plans) and Quality Councils as a priority target is proving difficult for GOSE (Government Office of the South East) to handle. If such a target cannot be agreed, it will make a mockery of the government's policy to get more Quality Parish Councils. Local Strategic Partnership The LSP is finalising a tighter package of objectives for the partners to achieve – objectives which are recognisable to the community and which directly reflect community needs as demonstrated by Parish/Village Appraisals. However future work could be dramatically curtailed if ESCC cut the funding of East Sussex LSPs by not passing on the "second homes" money. This would renege on an agreement of only two years ago when all the District Councils, the Sussex Police Authority, the East Sussex Fire Authority and the County Council pledged their shares of the second homes money to the work of the county and six district/urban LSPs in East Sussex.
It was approved in principle that accommodation for PCSO’s in
the Parish itself would be provided if possible.
ACTION: Cllr P Tester and the Clerk to propose sites for
accommodating PCSO’s in the community and all Councillors to
make suggestions as well.
. Council Minutes 17 January 2006 Page 6
Maresfield Conservation Group · The Secretary, Michael Wheeler, has recently met with Persimmon Homes and saw an outline plan for the Park Farm development. He reported it was an interesting outline plan but emphasised the opposition of the residents in the Park Farm area. · In considering the revised Onyx application the Conservation Group has agreed that the amendments to the application are so minor that its position has not changed and it still objects. · The results of a recent survey among Conservation Group members regarding the prioritisation of traffic calming measures in the village will be fed into the T&T Committee by Peter Knivett.
1034 Questions to Chairman
– No report. 1035 Clerk's Report -
1036 Payments to be made for approval – Payments totalling £7,336.75 were Agreed. 1037 Quality Council submission – progress update
1038 Communications
1.
The Parish Matters – winter edition – Submissions deadline 30th
January 2006
Date of next meeting 21st February 2006 (Nutley) |
| Copyright © 2012 Maresfield Parish Council Webmaster: C Stevenson |