|
Minutes of the Extraordinary Meeting of Council held on Tuesday
7th August 2007
in the Village Hall, Maresfield
Present:
Cllr K Ogden (Chairman), Cllr W King, Cllr Mrs V Taylor, Cllr H
Fry, Cllr J Handley,
Cllr R Street,
Cllr J Gutteridge, Cllr R Galley, Mr T Allen (Clerk) & Mrs C
Goossens
(Asst Clerk)
Public:
Ms M Thomas, Mr D Thompson.
It was Agreed that a debate of the Council’s draft consultation
response would be held in the Public Session to allow for all
present to be involved but that items 1308 and 1309 would be
taken first.
1308. To approve apologies for absence and to note other
non-attendance.
Cllr D Barlow, Cllr A Clarke, Cllr D Finch, Cllr P Harris, DCllr
N Buck and DCllr Mrs S Martin.
1309. To note declarations of interest.
Cllr King re. item 1311, payment to Nutley PCC of which he is
Secretary.
Cllr Street re. item 1311, payment to Fairwarp Village Hall of
which his wife is a committee member.
The Chairman closed the meeting and opened the public session.
The Chairman asked Cllr King to lead on this part of the
meeting.
A. Public Session.
The Council’s draft response document was discussed with the
following additions and amendments noted:-
Q1
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q2
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q3
Agreed as per draft submission but with the inclusion of the
following comment reference 3a:-
“Use of such land should be instead of rather than in addition
to other sites.”
Reference 3b:- “Generally agree but we are
concerned that this could be too restrictive and stunt
development. Flexibility is required necessitating site by site
assessments.”
Q5
Change draft response to show that we prefer an up-rated 5a
which should read:-
“Settlement boundaries should be maintained but should be
expanded where needed subject to strict criteria to allow for
only small scale development. This should be limited to the
satisfaction of local community needs which include cohesion and
sustainability”.
Comment re Conservation Area was Agreed as per draft
submission.
Q6
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q7
Agree with draft response for 7a but also to include the
Parish Council’s definition of “needs” to read as follows:-
“Agree with Option 7a – if these are based on facts and
the ability of the existing infrastructure to cope with
increased demands. Growth should be limited to the satisfaction
of local community needs which include cohesion and
sustainability”.
7b
Agreed as per draft submission.
7c
Agreed as per draft submission.
7d
Agreed as per draft submission.
Additional comment to draft response 7e:-
“WDC’s interpretation of its own criteria in relation to Nutley
is incorrect and inaccurate and therefore Nutley should be
defined as a village with limited growth potential”.
Q9
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q10
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q14
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q19
Change draft response to read:-
“WDC’s interpretation of its own criteria in relation to Nutley
is incorrect and inaccurate and therefore Nutley should be
defined as a village with limited growth potential”.
Q21
Agreed as per draft submission but substitute “We consider a
figure of over 300 homes excessive” with the following:- “We
believe that an upper limit for Maresfield should be set at 300
homes”.
Q24
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q25
Agreed as per draft submission but re. option 25g “i.e.”
replaced by “and for”.
Q27
Agreed as per draft submission with the following additional
general comments:-
“Transport policy requires a more substantial assessment and
additional work to maintain and improve the quality of life in
our villages. Consideration should be given in each case to the
potential adverse impact of developments on the A22 in Nutley,
the existing “rat runs” in Maresfield and the B2026 at Fairwarp,
and the provision of suitable mitigation measures”.
Cllr R Galley left the meeting.
27b
Agreed as per draft submission.
27e
Agreed as per draft submission.
Q29
Agreed as per draft submission with the additional comment:-
“The general call for infrastructure to be in place needs proper
assessment.”
Q30
Agreed as per draft submission.
With the final sentence to read as follows:-
“The impact of the whole Plan needs to be fully assessed and a
plan provided for fulfilment, and also to address additional
concerns not currently shown in the consultation document, such
as A&E provision, maternity provision, proximity of hospitals,
GP provision, education, public transport and road networks.
Whilst many of these are outside of WDC’s remit, they should
still be a prime factor in WDC’s site allocation policy. WDC
must be expected to provide a more complete review and ensure
that site allocations be identified by reference to availability
of existing services or planned services.”
Q31
Response amended to read as follows:- “It is essential that
Maresfield Parish should generally remain the same. It is
difficult to take one spatial view for the whole of Wealden and
in particular the three villages in Maresfield Parish should be
considered as separate and distinct.”
LDF Matrices A and B to be included in the response to the
consultation to illustrate where WDC’s information is
incorrect.
ACTION: All to provide comments to Cllr King by close of
business 08/08/2007.
The Chairman closed the public session and re-opened the
meeting.
1310. To agree Council’s response to the WDC Core Strategy
Issues & Options consultation for the Local Development
Framework.
It was Agreed that the Council’s response should be
finalised by the Chairman, Cllr King and the Clerk in line with
the points proposed in the Public Session as a development of
the circulated draft response.
1311. Payments to be made: for approval.
The amended payments schedule was circulated to Councillors.
Cllr Street proposed payments totalling £4423.27 be approved,
this was seconded by Cllr Mrs Taylor and Agreed by all.
1312.
Date of next meeting - 18th September 2007 (Fairwarp).
There being no further business, the meeting closed at 21.33.
|